Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (188273)	6/1/2022 5:54:30 PM
From: arun gera	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217750

<There was temptation to develop and release a virus, and have a protection package ready to sell. People do stuff like that> You cannot have it both ways. If virus was designed and released to make Trump look bad, then having a ready made protection package would have made Trump look great. He just had to be presidential and not deny the virus or its cure, and he would have won the election. So it looks like you are stuck in a variation of Trump Derangement Syndrome. All explanations do not have to involve Trump (or Elon Musk these days). Why would USA have a rival China test a potential bioweapon? Why would China agree? They know what a potential bioweapon is. Is China secretly aligned with USA while pretending to its own populace otherwise. With billions of dollars of untrackable US military money floating around, why would such a small fund be directed through a small organization leaving a trail behind for such an important bioweapon? -Arun

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (188273)	6/1/2022 8:03:48 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217750

very controversial