Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (190764)	8/9/2022 4:44:44 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217714

<<So we paid it all in unnecessary loss of life and interest>> So the Vietnamese would still be working for their French masters? There would have been a lot more Banana wars too, encircling the globe, not just South America. United Fruit would have done OK I guess. Who knows how many casualties would have to be suffered to knock the Russian military machine back into place (if it were possible) , so there would have been a lot of blood thirsty troops and power hungry politicians with axes to grind at the end, human nature being what it is. Back to my previous post. It is a mind boggling statistic... There were more casualties in just one WW2 battle in Ukraine then Britain suffered in the whole of WW2. All of the battles on several different continents. Your conjecture looks an unsteady one.