Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (5828)	2/11/1998 12:47:00 AM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Respond to of 20981

Paul, Finally! Please, will somebody give this man the microphone and turn the camera on him? Holly

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (5828)	2/11/1998 1:05:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

>>No! The point is that this is a mindless, tabloidized diversion from the real problems facing the world today! Should Eisenhower have resigned as head of SHAEF because of an affair with Kate Summersby? Should Kennedy have been politically hobbled and be unable to deal with the Soviets in Cuba? Yes! The Clinton sex scandal now involves possible criminal obstruction of justice, unlike previous cases, so avoiding the scandal is not in any way a real world option. The present situation is clearly a product of Clinton's own recklessness. The logical implication and the only way for the U.S. to do what Rosenthal deems necessary would be for Clinton to do the honorable thing - resign for the good of the country. But of course, doing the honorable thing would be out of "character" for Clinton and he said Never! to that, once again putting his interests above U.S. interests.