Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Northrich Pacific Ventures NPA:V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KC Jones who wrote (7063)	2/11/1998 4:46:00 PM
From: Tinman	Respond to of 7431

Sad fact is we're along for the ride (if there is one). Interesting that the no. of shares accounted for on this thread, as reported by j.mcknight, represents about 20% of those not held by CDS and Cede & co. Still nowhere near enough to make any impact on an AGM. No word on possible resumption of trading? AMS

To: KC Jones who wrote (7063)	2/11/1998 6:55:00 PM
From: dave herbert	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7431

Greetings kc I am not positive but i believe that CDS is domion securities as far as cedes it appears as if there holdings correspond with what RH should still have hmmm.Also Rahpar hldgs(spelling not correct) last year held about 1.4 mil shares be interesting to know who owns them as they seem to be big winners.The 375,000 shares to directors at 1 cent is that before or after consolidation if after then that would over ride RHs shares.There are many questions that need to be answered with the co not giving much time as they have not formlly told investors of the meeting.Are all these things needed to resume trading or are they simply be pushed through by Shah.The name change is needed in order to disassociate with RHs doings.Alas to many questions and to little time to organize enough shares to force answers as it seems most shares are out there it only needs time to get the message outside of SI to have a voice.