SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jhild who wrote (6025)2/12/1998 1:40:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 20981
 
>>then his doing so does not advance Starr's argument, which seems to be your position.

Wrong. It never was Starr's argument. It was the WH's!

And it is their rationale that has been broken, i.e. that agents can't talk because once agents do talk the prez will try to avoid them. Since that has already happened, they can no longer logically maintain their position, which never was based on the law anyway.



To: jhild who wrote (6025)2/12/1998 2:53:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Looks like you got your wish:

excerpt NYT February 12, 1998

Subpoenas Issued to Secret Service in Intern Inquiry



By DAVID E. SANGER and JOHN M. BRODER

WASHINGTON -- Prosecutors investigating President Clinton's
relationship with a former White House intern have subpoenaed
members of the Secret Service, setting up a new confrontation with the
Whitewater independent counsel over the Clinton administration's desire
to restrict the testimony of close aides and the Secret Service.

Government officials confirmed that the subpoenas had been issued to the
Secret Service, but it remained unclear whether the independent counsel,
Kenneth Starr, was seeking the testimony of agents currently or formerly
assigned to Clinton's protective detail.

The Secret Service has challenged any effort to force Clinton's
bodyguards to testify, arguing that it would compromise their ability to
protect the president. The Treasury Department, which oversees the
Secret Service, has been negotiating with Starr to try to avert a court
battle over the issuance of subpoenas.

Starr has rejected White House claims that certain conversations between
Clinton and his close advisers are covered by executive privilege.
Clinton's lawyers contended that he cannot conduct the business of the
presidency without assurance that he can talk in confidence to his top
aides.....

Treasury and Justice lawyers are not arguing that members of the Secret
Service are protected by executive privilege. Instead, they are trying to
carve out a new privilege, arguing that the president's life could ultimately
be endangered if he kept his protective detail at a distance out of concern
that the agents could be called to reveal conversations or meetings they
witness.

nytimes.com