Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alchemy who wrote (2634)	2/12/1998 9:31:00 AM
From: bob	Respond to of 4736

bob Boonen! ROFLMAO!! Marty, You have been on SI a lot longer than I have. Bob Boonen

To: alchemy who wrote (2634)	2/12/1998 9:40:00 AM
From: Sidney Reilly	Respond to of 4736

For those on the thread with a sacrilegious bent I thought this was pretty funny although I read it while watching out for lightning to strike. <gg> It is also a pretty good example of how things can get twisted depending on your point of view. Message 3403261

To: alchemy who wrote (2634)	2/12/1998 9:57:00 AM
From: bob	Respond to of 4736

Message 1997615

To: alchemy who wrote (2634)	2/13/1998 3:54:00 PM
From: Michael T Currie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

> I spoke with Paul Ebeling last night who assured me that NAMX and Gruy have an excellent relationship. He finds it hard to believe that any officer of a company would discuss company matters with just any caller. Folks, First of all, I'll say that I still maintain grave doubts about both EMSounder and the size/quality of the gas reserves that NAMX has announced - but you already knew that, didn't you?<g>. However, I couldn't let this one pass by. If Gruy, which is I presume a respected engineering firm (never heard of them personally, but don't take that to mean anything), has actually released anything like the information that was supposedly given out over the phone, they have violated every rule in the book for consultants. Either NAE needs to reevaluate who they use for reserves estimation or someone is lying. I will leave it to yourselves to decide. Mike (sticking my nose in where it doesn't belong)