SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Satyr who wrote (17282)2/12/1998 10:35:00 AM
From: Roads End  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Satyr..I hear what you are saying. If you take the issue you just presented about using accounting gimmicks it could have just as easily been framed this way..."CFO Mason has optimized CPQ's financials by speeding the conversion of it's accounts recievable to cash". A/R sitting on the books makes you nothing and is a risk. I'll hold cash any day.



To: Satyr who wrote (17282)2/12/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Satyr and Thread - I would expect Compaq's management to use every tool they have to enhance the bottom line. Why not? Mason and crew have a rep for savvy financial management. Look, I keep bringing up the example of IBM, but Gerstner and crew have seen a QUINTUPLING of the stock price since he came on board, accomplished with LITTLE or NO growth in most core areas of IBM's business, with the exception of services. How did they do it? FINANCIAL ENGINEERING!! They cut costs, they cut bodies, they bought back billions in stock, etc. etc. I'm not arguing that IBM can 'cut' it's way to continued prosperity, but if CPQ can leverage factoring and anything else, they should do so. So, the bottom line is that cost management and financial innovation are not necessarily viewed as negative by the Street. As for the rest of the article, it will be forgotten in a few days. Remember the uproar when IBM announced earnings recently? Stories about continued 'Asia pain', and IBM's CFO said growth will be slower and earnings flat the next quarter. Well, the stock has done just fine since then.

John



To: Satyr who wrote (17282)2/12/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: Thomas Dremel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 97611
 
Factoring acct receivables makes sense if it improves profjts - this is Mason's reasoning as CFO. I don't think the WSJ writer knows diddly about finance and how to improve the balance sheet. Nothing but garbage info from the article. Nothing to worry about, the stock will bounce soon.

Tom D (CPA that understands factoring as a way of improving the balance sheet)