SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (195811)2/3/2023 3:11:18 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219451
 
That is the first chart I have seen with Russia ahead of Canada.. let alone an easy double.. US continues to punch way above its weight using a population metric

Wow.. been doing stuff in 3D US markets giving back again.. yo yo time

reality of good news is bad news ? for a bit it looked like good news was actually good news LOL

mostly out presently



To: maceng2 who wrote (195811)2/4/2023 3:30:26 AM
From: sense  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 219451
 
The (PPP) stuff is total BS...

An nominal $86 trillion global economy suddenly becomes "worth" $136.5 trillion... because... ?

The fictional $50 trillion shift (increase !) in an $85 trillion economy is entirely smoke and mirrors.

Or, it requires explaining how that $50 trillion offset resulting from "market inefficiency" in exchange works and survives without the currency markets correcting it ?

Are the currency markets that wrong, mis-priced by that much ?

It's basically about as valid a concept as "good will"... an accounting entry "worth whatever we say it is"... applying some standard other than actual market prices as "value" equivalents.

Or, since I like living in a swamp and hate cities, it means my mobile home parked 1 foot above sea level on a bayou in S. Louisiana... is really worth the same as Trump's place in Mar-a-lago ?

My guess is China and the U.S. are both mutually over-stated, a lot of nominal value tied up in their relationship, the real and relative value of which is in precipitous decline... so both overstated in both real terms and in relation to the rest... but, in the U.S. I can at least calculate the ratios in biasing errors... while China's #'s are... obvious political fictions. I don't expect the post 2020 reality or trend changes will be decipherable before 2025...

And, then... adjusting things for post 2020 reality... may have to wait for "other" political resolutions... once the smoking holes left by various "reset" attempts are filled in and leveled over ?

For now... the nominal increases just masking "shrinkage" with inflation...