Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (196299)	2/14/2023 4:54:52 AM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By marcher Respond to of 217710

Addendum: From Dr Fisher. "I believe, however, that there is such a thing as an UNscientific method, and that, rather like Lewis Carroll’s conception of an UNbirthday in Alice in Wonderland, it is much more common than the real thing. The rules for applying the unscientific method to a problem are simple: ~ Know what answer you are looking for. ~ Look for evidence and arguments to support your answer. ~ Avoid or ignore evidence and arguments that do not support your answer. ~ Deride those who disagree with you. It’s that simple. And it is much easier to use than any real scientific method. Maybe that’s why so many people use it." Some Examples spring to mind from Dr Fishers analysis: (a) JFK. He was obviously shot from the front, not the rear. Do the ballistic experts who developed the "magic bullet theory" consider this basic piece of evidence? Did they deliberately ignore?? (b) 911. We knew the "answer" within minutes, and just look at what's been found out since. (c) Covid19. Again, we knew the "answer" within the first "News" broadcast or two. The "conclusion" stunk to high heaven since the get go.

To: maceng2 who wrote (196299)	2/14/2023 11:10:51 PM
From: sense	1 Recommendation Recommended By maceng2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217710

The cartoon pegs it... But, if meeting the logic it shows... politics is not science, as dogs are not cats... The pols, having squandered their own, are simply trying to steal the "legitimacy" and unquestioning acceptance that comes paired with lying about their "outcome driven" opinions being "the science"... And, that's exactly true re CO2 and "global warning" nee "climate change"... all of which is about fraud used in diverting more legitimate flows of $ to themselves... and imposing control... none of which is about science. They can't tolerate having "an uncontrolled source of truth" that might undermine, derail or compete with their plans, when those inconvenient realities and truths are exposed... so, you see "advocates"... a tell in itself... of CO2 driven global warming "theory"... conducting political operations, not science... because "its too important" to leave it to... a legitimate and truthful conduct of inquiry in good faith. They're destroying "science"... eliminating real inquiry in favor of "politically dictated opinion"... So, in terms of "progress"... we've reverted right back to the days of Galileo and Copernicus... Which shouldn't be surprising, if you know "them"... ?