Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (625)	2/12/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: LPasko	Respond to of 6528

No, sorry, but you haven't done these things-- you haven't detailed what you believe was done under his leadership. Go back and read the SEC Consent decree which TideGlider posted earlier this evening at Post 590. You will see that you are misunderstanding the SEC action--all the fraudulent conduct alleged is that of the board that Mr. Raabe ousted. NO CHARGES were brought against Mr. Raabe. (The Company was faulted for not being current in its SEC filings, but that happens all the time when new management can't yet establish all of the allegedly bogus dealings of a previous management team).

To: TopCat who wrote (625)	2/12/1998 11:55:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6528

I think I already indicated that the actions of the the company that let up to the November 1996 action by the SEC would seem to have occurred under his leadership... Once again, your "facts" are INCORRECT. The SEC action was taken on activity that occurred in 1994. As LPasko already advised you, this was months before Mr. Raabe came on board. Stop your innuendo using incorrect information and assumptions. Simply using the words "would seem" does not excuse you nor does it lend itself to being factual.