SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (6360)2/13/1998 4:16:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 20981
 
>>What's getting tiring though, is people (mainly Clinton supporters) trying to change the subject and say they don't think we should be investigating Clinton's sex life. But his sex life is not the issue. The issue is that the Clinton administration has shown that in this, as in all the past scandals, is probably covering up, lying, etc. The following is a very brief mention of some of the abuses tied directly to this administration (in no particular order):....

Hear, hear!!!

The Clinton apologists will use any device to divert attention from the fact that the personal aspect of this the latest Clinton scandal is not in any way the issue of Starr's investigation.



To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (6360)2/13/1998 3:08:00 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 20981
 
Dwight, Idaho, and all,

I am not one of those who is focused on Clinton's sexual conduct. The media have made it the issue. It is the points in your post the media should be fixated on, but they are not. I find the media and our acceptance of their reportage, AND lack thereof, far more sinister and threatening to us than anything one man allegedly does or has done--including President Clinton.

Holly