Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Coley who wrote (47812)	2/13/1998 4:47:00 PM
From: eric larson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Reuters reported the Nomai decision finally today at 14:48PM EST: newsalert.com US court lets Nomai sell rival to Iomega's Zip Reuters Story - February 13, 1998 14:48 "...Iomega officials were not immediately available to comment on the court decision." Here's the intraday trading response: 207.95.154.130

To: Michael Coley who wrote (47812)	2/13/1998 6:19:00 PM
From: slipnsip	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

"I don't consider the thread here on SI a good "emotional indicator" because most of the regulars here have done their research and are willing to ride the waves." I couldn't agree with you more. Went to Yahoo message boards last week. I won't be going back anytime soon. SI has garnered a great following. The recent fee hikes will ensure that the quality continues. (Glad I got in before it cost anything!)

To: Michael Coley who wrote (47812)	2/13/1998 6:47:00 PM
From: Ken Pomaranski	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

RE: Signs of a Bottom? yea, I may start trading this stock again. I don't see how things can get much worse. I think it will test 8 (or close) again then maybe start up (until the Q1 report, that is). About Yahoo vs. SI: Yes, I agree. The people who post at Yahoo are way, way out there. I swear to God, they should require everyone who is going to trade stocks take a class and pass a test, or at least take an IQ test.. kp PS. That's a good observation about the Naomi case. What matters is the precedent, not the particulars of the case.