Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (6601)	2/14/1998 4:52:00 AM
From: Jack Clarke	Respond to of 20981

Janice, I can't put my hands on it right now, and the Alta Vista search isn't being cooperative, so I'll just have to stick by my memory that Dr. Thompson is not a doctor of medicine. I think he puts the title on his luggage, etc., so he may be mistaken for an MD by those who see it. (As you may remember, most US physicians do not sign their names "Dr." as they do in Europe but use the degree suffix, i.e., M.D. And some of us don't use either except in the professional situation. By the way, here's what our Dr. Thompson said about Mr. Clinton: Bookpgsara: What do you think about Clinton? Where does he come in in the hieracrchy (sic) of bad presidents? Hunter Thompson: Well, we still have a few years ago (sic). Clinton already stands accused formally of worse things than Nixon would have been impeached for. I think Clinton is every bit as. . . he's not as crude as Nixon. But maybe he is. I mean: Paula Jones? "Come over here, little girl, I've got something for you" !? It's almost embarrassing to talk about Clinton as if he were important. I'd almost prefer Nixon. I'd say Clinton is every bit as corrupt as Nixon, but a lot smoother. Jack