Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (28076)	2/14/1998 5:39:00 PM
From: Ray Burke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

Val,You ask "why are my questions a problem" There are a lot of questions I have concerning what you post. My first question is: Could you read this line from your partner ArchieP, and explain what he means about Valuespec.com? I too think that ftel is a small cap company with good growth potential also! Thanks for all your "focus"! "Iam working with Valuespec (don't hurl yet) on his web page. The main focus will be on small cap companies with good growth potential down the road. There are about 8 or 10 companies on the board now and in the future there will be dozens more." Just what is your "focus"?? Is there a personal crusade or vendeta against someone or some company here?? Where do you stand?? highlight added TIA for the clarification, Ray

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (28076)	2/14/1998 5:49:00 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41046

The "I"'s Have it.VA/S, you wrote:Raleigh, I challenge you to offer your information on the WCOM deal as from the view of WCOM representatives, and this is how you respond? If you have something good to share, why would it be such a burden to share what was said to you from WCOM? Really, RB, if you are sincere about having done a lot of research on FTEL, and really like what you found, I don't understand why you don't take these opportunities to shares your knowledge with the thread. If I find that WCOM has wonderful things to say about the significance and/or difficulty of getting a collocation agreement with FTEL, I will post it here and maybe even buy a lot of stock. However, if I find that WCOM does not look at the deal as favorably as you seem to, then I will certainly report what I found and what I concluded from that research. If you and vic, and Ray, etc., all have done so much research, why are my questions a problem? It makes me think you are afraid of the answers. I will give names and phone numbers of everyone who gives me permission at WCOM. I will document my findings just like I did with Franks' shares. Is that not fair? Are not my posts in valuespec.com fair? What would you like me to remove? If the information you point out to me is inappropriate I may remove it, or perhaps I'll remove it anyway as a good gesture. I'm not here to trash FTEL. I'm here to learn and share ideas about a stock, just like everyone else, albeit I have the opposite opinion of it. Also, I would ask that you stop calling me names. Thank you ! Talk about Ego Silence is Golden Endeavor to Perservere bg

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (28076)	2/14/1998 10:47:00 PM
From: Catfisher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

VS, It appears that you have some personal knowledge of "things they" (WCOM) "are saying about the significance and/or difficulty of getting a collocation agreement with FTEL". You seem to be implying that WCOM is dissatisfied with FTEL in this regard. Rather than accusing other members of this tread of having these facts and not sharing this information with the thread, why don't you just share the facts of what you know about this with the thread. It would be so much more productive if you would drop the use of innuendo and use verifiable fact instead. By the way, in your post to Judith, your reference to your link, "http://www.valuespec.com/reports/@EDUCATIONAL/AboutCEOandPRc..." seemed pretty irrelevant, to me. Thank you. Cliff