To: Gutterball who wrote (1721 ) 2/14/1998 10:16:00 PM From: S.C. Barnard Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6464
Yes, Bill happened to also mention Joe did sell some, like other companies have on occasion (see SEC BAAT form 144's) but not near any kind of illegal amount, said Bill. I would have thought you'd already asked this of them yourself, being that smart guy? I doubt I got a different answer. I still believe in the company, and I think once they post some "lies" on their site, things'll be a bit more into contrast between BS and fact. Say what you like to whomever, the info's yet to arrive. There's no reward for assuming BAAT is crap just yet. Not that I should go into it, but as I being a book eater: if you're on the fence about the stock, and you're not getting the answers you have to have, what else would be next but to find a more informative stock? Seems like fish or cut bait time, IMO. As a smart guy with lateral vision, I find it hard to believe you like expressing any unconfirmable (as yet) dark assumptive opinions about a stock before SEC has it's say. I am not so 'hype'r on the positive side, I'm not heavily invested so I dont have to go insane if it heads south. The reason I go for this type of thing is it's what is important for the near future, and the environment. If this one fails, another will succeed, eventually. I would like to be in on a successful technology, which I still think it is/can be. Even though the present population growth has finished any long term possibility for the human race, short of mass annihilation or space stations/travel to Mars, etc.. Oh, yeah, more importantly, that was true, though. Joe sold some stock at one time, like other companies. How recent? you have the phone #, you should call. I can't afford it.