Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: POKERSAM who wrote (16436)	8/3/2023 12:10:06 AM
From: Kirk ©	2 Recommendations Recommended By Clam digger nicewatch Respond to of 26837

But Yes, I think it has probably already begun. You've said that for every decline over 1%. Eventually.... It is really not different than the guy who keeps calling bottoms when the markets fell over 50% then when they recover keeps bragging about the great bottom call in official advertising... and I still get emails from his former subs who say they made good money following his timing calls even though he was FULLY INVESTED at the top of the last three bear markets so even if he "called a bottom" there were no funds in his model portfolios to buy with. Just incredible. The guy probably had one of the largest national followings in the US back in the 1990s. Anyway, he would have called you a "bad news bear".

To: POKERSAM who wrote (16436)	8/3/2023 4:31:04 AM
From: nicewatch	2 Recommendations Recommended By #Breeze rogermci® Respond to of 26837

You claim to have traded the bear market rallies well in your pit. OK. And you also claim to post multiple charts daily or at least on a regular basis with doctors and lawyers as your subscribers. OK. Ergo, given your public stubbornness, considering it's so long after the fact, can you even provide post-dated charts of all of these bear market rallies you claim to have traded with your subs? I know an actual trading record from you will never be released. But let's start from August 2022 to December 2022 in an index of your choice. Fair enough? Please educate us with the profundity of your countertrend wave trading. And if you are uncomfortable with that then please cherry-pick any timeline that flatters you best! Why aren't there more SI posters willing to go public with their subscription to your pit? The only one I found seems to be a dreg and only told me in private and seems to be a mess on multiple levels. Respectfully yours, Mr. nicewatch

To: POKERSAM who wrote (16436)	8/7/2023 2:13:15 PM
From: Kirk ©	2 Recommendations Recommended By #Breeze rdkflorida2 Respond to of 26837

Well, you banned me for stating the obvious: A correct top call without a buy back call before a new high is made is worthless... So I'll return the favor. If you want back, you can post an apology on your board then send a link to me via email to read it. Sad, I thought your skin was thicker than your nemesis, but I was wrong. I'm in good company with the recent additions. . . Is anyone left to talk to on your board?

To: POKERSAM who wrote (16436)	2/12/2024 1:57:46 PM
From: Kirk ©	3 Recommendations Recommended By berniel rdkflorida2 rogermci® Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26837

Oops... The drop to 3491 was not nearly low enough. I am surprised this advance from 3491 has gone as high as it has. There were several times it could have ended but the C wave of the correction up just kept extending and ended up longer than usual.This next major leg down will be much longer than the first one. (5048-3491)/3491x100% = 45% - Ouch for you bears! It sure looks like 3491 WAS low enough and all the buying I did has me crying Yipee! I recall you said SPX wouldn't hit 4,000... Is breaking 5,000 last week enough for you to switch to Bull or did you give up predicting? .