Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (200687)	8/10/2023 7:24:21 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Recommended By SirWalterRalegh Respond to of 217815

I don't see why negotiations are needed. Acceptance of how things are is all that's needed. Maybe for ease of administration, Kievan bosses could ask Russia to take over the whole of Luhansk, Donetsk and the Z place to stay with original boundaries. Announce on X that borders are open for trade again. Just as there weren't negotiations when Crimea was added to the administration zone of Ukraine, it was just done with some paperwork, so can the borders be easily agreed as already drawn on maps and in filing cabinets in the various city council offices in the Donbas region. As agreed by Russia when the independent provinces applied for membership of Russia. The criminal coup in Kiev started off the problems - done by Obama, Nuland, Biden and co-conspirators in CIA etc. I don't see why the UN needs to be involved. They've caused enough trouble. The local yokels can easily agree to get along, trade and enjoy life, without a bunch of UN bludgers sticking their noses in. The UN should have been advising NATO to stop the war preparations 20 years ago. And 10 years ago. But they were kissy kissy with Obama while Hunter raked in umpty $millions for BigGuy10% et al and the military suppliers and politicians raked in $billions. Mqurice