SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Triluminary who wrote (7206)2/16/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Can we all at least agree that the Polygraph test is about as accurate as Theordoric of York's floating witch test.

"If she is a witch she will float and we hang her."

"If she is innocent she will sink."

"But won't she drown?"



To: Triluminary who wrote (7206)2/16/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
As the impending testimony of Lewinsky draws closer, the effort to shift the focus attention from the investigation to the investigator.... will become more and more vociferous . Lewinski's lawyers must be quaking in their boots to pull such a desperate media stunt....I hope for the sake of all concerned, Lewis will cut the invalid act..finish up her testimony so that the remainder of the investigation can go forward. bp



To: Triluminary who wrote (7206)2/16/1998 4:32:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Wild. Let's have EVERYONE do polygraphs. The entire administration, Congress, the press, anyone who's ever spoken with Monica in her LIFE. Taht should keep 'em busy.

And in the meanwhile I'm working on MY story: "Monica Never Told Me About Affair With the Big Creep". Makes you wonder, doesn't it?

And don't miss this:

Meanwhile, a friend of Kathleen Willey, the woman
who said Clinton groped her, has raised questions
about the truth of Willey's claims in an sworn affidavit,
CNN has learned.

The affidavit has been presented to attorneys in the
Paula Jones case by Julia Hiatt Steele. In it, Steele
disputes Willey's claim that the president groped her
in a study off the Oval Office when she approached
him about a job, sources told CNN.

The sources, who are familiar with the affidavit's
contents, said Steele swears she was called by
Willey in "March or April of '97" to say she was in the
office of her attorney.

Willey asked that Steele meet with Newsweek
reporter Mike Isikoff and tell Isikoff that she [Willey]
had come directly to Steele's home in Richmond, Va.,
the same day she visited the president in the Oval
Office. She asked Steele to say that Willey had told
her the president had made advances and groped her.

Steele, according to the sources describing the
affidavit, told Willey she couldn't make those
statements because none of that happened.

But in the affidavit, Steele said she did fabricate the
story for Isikoff when Willey told Steele "it would be all
right if I lied to him" and that Willey needed her to do
this and would explain it later.

In her affidavit, the sources said, Steele says she did
not see Willey that day and never heard of any
improper conduct with Clinton.