Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WalleyB who wrote (7223)	2/16/1998 5:01:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Obviously someone has gotten to Steel!! Or perhaps someone got to Willey much earlier? Remember: at the moment she was in quite desperate financial straits. She's since retracted what she said about harassment, as I understand it. One must consider all of the possibilities.

To: WalleyB who wrote (7223)	2/18/1998 2:21:00 AM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Jim, can you or someone who knows something of the facts in the Kathleen Willey case try to cast some light on Steel's statement? I was quite puzzled by this, since Willey was a VERY reluctant witness in the Jones case, who did not come forward on her own, did not want to testify at all, and seemed disheveled but sort of flattered at the president's intentions, according to Linda Tripp, who ran into her outside of the Oval Office with her blouse untucked and her make-up smeared. So this just doesn't make logical sense, does it?