Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (275999)	11/12/2023 3:42:35 PM
From: Doo	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362956

I think you make huge assumptions here, as always, to suit your agenda. I have no idea what the facts are that the FBI possessed that might have prompted use of an armored vehicle against a winger who ran from them. And, neither do you. If there were no facts to warrant its use, then you have a point, although I still think there's a difference between a tank and an armored vehicle such as the one pictured in news reports. You don't have any facts to support your supposition, so we'll leave it at that. Also, even though you have no facts, you distinguish between this winger's behavior and "a wildly unpredictable violent gangbanger." What is the difference you see, factually, between this winger running from the FBI in a neighborhood and a wildly unpredictable gangbanger? Finally, please show me what prompts you to state that I think utilization of an armored vehicle by the FBI against the "gangbanger" is inappropriate under certain circumstances AND where I "questioned it." I expect silence or, if you respond at all, deflection...