SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rdkflorida2 who wrote (1434964)1/22/2024 3:02:25 PM
From: Doren1 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576816
 
Both of my home towns and the next town I'm moving to have mothballed nuke plants with their waste stored onsite. Two out of the 4 reactors are next to huge earthquake faults. Two are on faults that were unknown when they were built.

Nuclear has never been cost effective. If it was insurance companies would have covered them. They aren't stupid.

Instead the taxpayers cover the insurance and it's woefully inadequate to cover something like Fukushima. Amazing how the right crows about "socialism" and ignores corporate socialism.

Its always been a bullshit story. I still remember nuke advocates crowing about how a meltdown was a billion to one odds. Obviously lies.



To: rdkflorida2 who wrote (1434964)1/22/2024 4:40:15 PM
From: Eric3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Doren
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 1576816
 
Nuclear waste storage is a huge problem. Still no well engineered waste repository in this country.

I just look at the increasing costs to clean up Hanford about 120 miles east of me.

It's simply staggering.