Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1438922)	2/12/2024 5:34:10 PM
From: Bill	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576296

The country deserves a ruling on each of those constitutional issues, none of which conflicts with another. Personally, I think they will decide the president is not an officer as contemplated by section 3, and they will pass on defining an insurrection and what it means to engage in one. There are many parts of the constitution that apply to the president only, but section 3 of the 14th may not. That has nothing to do with your flawed assertion that they are saying he's above the law. You say that just because you hate him, which is your right protected by the first amendment.