Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1438956)	2/12/2024 7:27:14 PM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572941

Regarding CO2, I have been reading that further increases in CO2 concentration with have smaller effects on global warming Nope It's directly proportional. Edit: SO2 is a different animal. en.wikipedia.org Volcanoes are peanuts in CO2: usgs.gov

To: maceng2 who wrote (1438956)	2/12/2024 8:45:15 PM
From: Wharf Rat	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1572941

Volcanos don't change the physics of water. == "particulates can seed clouds" That doesn't change water vapor pressure. Water - Saturation Pressure vs. Temperature The Engineering ToolBox Online calculator, figures and tables with water saturation (vapor) pressure at temperatures ranging 0 to 370 °C (32 to 700°F) - in Imperial and SI Units. == " have been reading that further increases in CO2 concentration with have smaller effects on global warming." Like this? Infrared Radiation and Planetary Temperature Ångström claimed that IR absorption by CO2 was saturated in the sense that, for those wavelengths CO2 could absorb at all, the CO2 already present in Earth's atmosphere was absorbing essentially all of the IR.