To: Bill who wrote (1440814 ) 2/21/2024 12:47:23 PM From: Tenchusatsu 3 RecommendationsRecommended By Brumar89 Eric pocotrader
Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575173 Bill, He chose not to settle with Carroll because he didn't rape her and he didn't defame her. It's already been established, in a court of law, based on the preponderance of the evidence (the standard set forth by civil cases), that he raped her and defamed her.Would you give me a couple million bucks if I accused you of something and then, when you denied it, I sued you for defamation? Again, it's been established by a preponderance of the evidence that Trump did what Carroll accused him of doing. Even the judge said so in the second defamation case. Your analogies are all based on false assumptions, so there's no need for me to answer them.This statement proves to me that you didn't read the judge's decision. The judge explained in detail why Trump was not entitled to a jury. Trump never declined one and never lied about being denied one. Why Trump's fraud trial in New York doesn't have a jury (Axios) Trump has claimed it's "unfair" that the judge in the case opted for a bench trial, without a jury. But the court docket shows that while Attorney General Letitia James filed a document requesting a bench trial, Trump's lawyers never filed any corresponding document requesting a jury. Trump isn't getting a jury in his $250 million civil fraud trial because his lawyers failed to ask for one (Business Insider) Alina Habba, one of the attorneys representing Trump in the case, said Trump wanted a jury in the case. "I know my client did want a jury, and we did want that," she said.She did not explain why they didn't ask for one. Tenchusatsu