Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (1443966)	3/4/2024 5:37:09 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	3 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 Eric pocotrader Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574767

Bill, Oppose what? It was an equitable relief trial. You just answered your own question. If Trump believed so strongly that he was unjustly denied a jury trial, he should have used the opportunity to file a motion requesting for a jury trial. And among his arguments should have been why the trial shouldn't have been considered an "equitable relief trial." His lawyers didn't even try. *That means they agreed with the judge's decision.* Trump was never denied a jury trial because his lawyers already agreed that this can't be a jury trial in the first place. Do you file a motion for a jury when you go to traffic court? Thanks for that analogy, Bill. It proves my point even more. In this analogy, Trump would have claimed, "I was unjustly denied a jury trial for my speeding ticket!" And you'd be right there agreeing with him and claiming that he was denied due process. Now you're confirming that due process was indeed followed here. Tenchusatsu