Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s martin who wrote (1077)	2/18/1998 1:57:00 AM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6528

Edited see RMIL...posted on wrong thread. TG

To: s martin who wrote (1077)	2/18/1998 9:17:00 AM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6528

Hmmmm... Wasn't aware I was trying to imply a "cozy" relationship with the SI folks. That is not how I'd describe the relationship. More like nodding acquaintances who're located relatively close. I'm confident that if I ever violated the ToU, I'd get booted out of here just as quickly as anyone else. As for his point that only shareholders can offer anything of merit to a thread, that is a blatantly false statement. When I go to a thread, what I'm initially looking for is two things: 1. Who are the shareholders and why are they? 2. Who isn't a shareholder and why not? It stands to reason that shareholders will have a more positive outlook on a company. That's why they're shareholders. It's important, though, to find out why others aren't shareholders. One-sided information is useless. Both sides must be presented. And when the most vocal shareholders are unable to present facts about a company, and choose to, instead, attack the non-shareholders, it's an important red flag. As little as Pugs cares what I think, I care even less what he thinks. But I do care very much what he tries to make others believe. And I also care quite a bit when it becomes evident that lying is one of the tools he uses. BTW, I think Pugs knows I was a shareholder in TVSI at one time. I bought a small pre-DD position on Friday, hoping RMIL lightning wouldn't strike twice. When this stock started looking too much like RMIL, I bailed. I got rid of 1/3 of my shares when it looked like the Riley/Pugs hype machine was in high gear on it, then the rest a few days later when it became obvious that the company itself is likely part of the game.