Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maverick who wrote (48129)	2/18/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: stock bull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Maverick....Maybe IOM should sue Lauderback and PC Week for slander. Never saw such a biased article like this one. This type of press can cause IOM harm...no facts were presented, no interviews with IOM representatives, just a bunch of hearsay. I am a believer of free speech...however, this type of reporting goes beyond the limits of reason. Stock Bull

To: Maverick who wrote (48129)	2/18/1998 2:24:00 PM
From: Ken Pomaranski	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 58324

<< Repost of the PCWEEK garbage >> I have a question for you guys: Who do you think is more likely to be correct: (1) A bunch of people who have never invested in a stock before (until Iomega) who sit around and have tea parties together? (2) The 'rest': - Wall Street - Wall street Journal - Herb Greenberg - PC week - analysts (Iomega only missed by a penny, remember) - Sony - Most institutions (look at the institutional ownership) - insiders. - et al... hmmm.. kp