Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1451356)	4/10/2024 4:22:33 PM
From: Bill	3 Recommendations Recommended By Broken_Clock golfer72 Taro Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571068

Oh give me a break. There's an election cycle every four years. Oh give me a break. They waited three years to bring charges so they could be SURE to interfere with the election. You'd have to be an idiot to think this isn't 100% political.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1451356)	4/10/2024 7:09:45 PM
From: i-node	3 Recommendations Recommended By Bill longz miraje Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571068

>> There's an election cycle every four years. Yes, and they stole it four years ago, and haven't figured out how to steal it when the guy running against him is senile. So, this is it. WHAT OTHER POSSIBLE EXPLANATION IS THERE FOR PUTTING OFF THESE TRIALS UNTIL THE MONTHS OF THE RUNUP TO THE ELECTION? Any of these trials could have been held earlier, but these creeps in NY, DC, and Fannie in GA, put it off until it was certain Trump would be the candidate and that they couldn't beat him. Personally I'm enjoying it, although I'm sure Trump isn't. In the end these horrible people will be defeated I believe.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1451356)	4/10/2024 11:32:47 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By longz miraje Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571068

>>Show me an example of how Trump lost a case that any other person would have won. I did, in reference to the EJC case. I cited the most authoritative constitutional lawyer I know of, who set out a well reasoned legal argument. It was t worth of an argument in your mind. And the same is True of the Tish James trial. I’ve testified as an expert witness in a good number of trials and I am not easily impressed in this subject matter. But this man nailed it, in every respect, and the judge has no credible testimony from any other witness, yet arbitrarily, citing incorrect data, threw it all out choosing his, they arbitrarily determined a massive judgment for half a billion dollars when no one sustained a nickel of loss. No one in his right mind would say that was a fair trial. Yet here you are. We need to get you in Texas Texas for a couple years because you aren’t thinking right and I think you can be fixed.