Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: david who wrote (5432)	2/18/1998 1:56:00 PM
From: The Barracuda™	Respond to of 10836

I banged out my kry today and went long Yamana which I think is better

To: david who wrote (5432)	2/18/1998 2:01:00 PM
From: viper	Respond to of 10836

David, thank you for the facts! There is no reason to push this stock other than to benefit by SELLING shares to unsophisticated investors who will no doubt suffer enormous losses. We believe this is a true short opportunity and have not been able to resist stating our case on this thread, and it is our hope that the little guys will get out and the big guys promoting the B.S. will somehow get caught-but we know that in the end the little guys will get hurt, again, and again.

To: david who wrote (5432)	2/18/1998 2:36:00 PM
From: Walter Kalin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10836

Thanks for info on the court system in Ven. I spoke with the CEO of TSO(Rick Clark) a few weeks ago. He is also the director of a no. of mining cos. TSO also has a property in Ven and has the rights to LC 5&7 under similar circumstances as KRY. I asked him if they would go after LC 5&7 and he told me the following: He doubts KRY has any chance of winning. He said he has spoken with lawyer in Ven., gov't officials , the mining dept. and nobody gives KRY a chance of winning. Further, Mr. Clark is a lawyer and a geologist and understands the case inside out. He says KRY is misleading alot of investors into thinking the case is going to be settled quickly. The court is still deciding whether to hear the case. If they decide to hear it, he expects it to take over a year. He hopes KRY wins because that would be great for his co. However, he is still saying no chance. Second point against KRY. My neighbor knows a director at WTC. He told him not to buy KRY as he knows the top people at PDG and he is 100% sure KRY will lose. I cannot comment why. Third point against KRY. I know of a shorter in the US that has a large short position on KRY. He never covered when KRY dropped to 4.30. He said he is positive KRY is going to under $1. Fourth point against KRY. We hear all sorts of rumours about Albino having 2 MIO and Brazil having 2 MIO....etc... I spoke with a geologist that looked at the drill results and he said max of 0.5 MIO that would be economic for Albino. Fifth point against KRY. Neil Maedel, another newsletter writer called KRY a well greased promo machine. He visited Ven. and talked to all sorts of gov't people down there. Point one for KRY. Bishop is fairly certain KRY will win based on Roy Carson info and other sources. A friend of mine talks to him on a regular basis. Point two. Many other newsletter writers also think KRY will win. Point three. Lots of powerful people on the KRY board. Both lists can go on and on. IMO if KRY wins its going to $CAD 15 to 20. If it has to goto to trial for another year(like you and Clark are saying) it will fall to under $CAD 4. If KRY loses it will be under $CAD 1 (because Albino and their other properties are not worth $CAD 0.50) Short covering will keep it close to $CAD 1. I know of plenty of good companies with better properties trading at lot less than $CAD 0.50 market cap of KRY. I also think its unfair that people put down PDG. KRY is taking the Ven. gov't to court and not PDG. It's your decision what you do with KRY. I wish you all the best of luck. WK

To: david who wrote (5432)	2/18/1998 2:37:00 PM
From: slave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Hello david i do have a few questions for you since you stated you would give us information.My first is are denouncement concessions any different than standard concessions and do you believe that I.Mael was granted denouncement concessions?My next question concerns the press release by Bloomberg that says Gomez stated the decision was made and is final-do you believe Bloomberg?-do you believe Gomez?-or is someone inaccurate?Thank you for your response..Dave

To: david who wrote (5432)	2/18/1998 4:01:00 PM
From: Al Lewis	Respond to of 10836

Off topic - Thanks David for your insight- I am not in KRY but follow it because of its neighbor Gold Reserve (GLR). Can you add anything about their situation. Would appreciate any input Thanks. If you have any info please reply on- Message 3280827 Sorry for the intrusion on this thread but I don't have an email address for David. Regards Al

To: david who wrote (5432)	2/18/1998 4:05:00 PM
From: ian dodge	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

David, Thank you for you clear elucidation of the court process. Can you tell me if the ponencia is a public document? Since we've heard infinite variations as to what is supposedly going on, it would be nice to to see something tangible. Thanks. As to what will happen if there is no news coming - well it's still the same company it was last month at this time with nothing to justify a doubling of the stock price. I see the stock price trickling downwards. IMO $7 is a real possibility by month's end.