SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1453193)4/21/2024 6:33:48 PM
From: Wharf Rat1 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570343
 
"Therefore if adverse effects are observed"
First, one has to verify that the adverse results are real.
==




To: maceng2 who wrote (1453193)4/22/2024 1:45:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Doren
Eric
pocotrader

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1570343
 
Maceng2,
Therefore if adverse effects are observed, normal procedure would be to assume the adverse effects are due to the vaccine until further testing and statistical analysis rules out the likelihood that the vaccine was the cause of adverse events.
Wrong. That's why there is a control group.

You need to prove to us that the control group didn't experience the same extreme adverse effects at the same rate as the experimental group.

And you need to prove it to us with actual data.

THEN you can come up with your conspiracy theories as to why Pfizer didn't see it, or why Pfizer saw it but felt they had a good chance to cover it up, etc.

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News