Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (206445)	7/1/2024 4:38:57 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By marcher Respond to of 219431

I pay more attention to geopolitics as that simply more fun even if might not be more important that national / domestic politics of any / any group of nations. I guess that no matter who wins the U.S. national election, Europe loses. A European loss is good for all except Europeans, in some sense, but might send Europe to reform school first, and such might turn out to be a longer term plus. Am fairly sure that Europe is messier than even California - hard to imagine but I try. De-industrialization is one mess. Migration another mess (I know, arguably, and I do not argue but prefer to wait). De-militarization was a surprise, unlike the former two vectors. Do not know what it takes to change directions, but fairly sure taking on Russia unlikely to be the easier way even as all ways ought to be hard, to seriously hard. At some juncture Europe might decouple from China, at behest of USA, or decide not to, or even decouple from USA in favor of China and therefore Russia, or in favor of Russia and therefore China, and if so, well, TeoTwawKi by any other name. Whichever ways, multipole planet would qualify as TeoTwawKi. 2026-2032 should be interesting as multi polarity comes to the fore decisively / irreversibly. 2032-2042 probably riveting as demography vectors take hold one or another way everywhere. 2042-2049 ohwhoawee as new planet becomes clear. Guesses. We watch the script roll.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (206445)

7/2/2024 9:55:34 PM

From: Selectric II

Respond to of 219431

Maybe this by renowned Constitutional Law Professor Jonathan Turley will leave an impression, in light of what the Brandon Administration, the media, and the Left have been feeding us.

Constitutional Law, Free Speech, Politics July 2, 2024

No, President Biden, the Supreme Court Did Not Remove All Limits on the Presidency

"President Joe Biden delivered an address from the White House last night on the presidential immunity decision by the Supreme Court. While pledging that he will defend the rule of law, President Biden misrepresented what that law is in the aftermath of Trump v. United States. While we have often discussed false constitutional claims by the President as well as other false statements, an address of this kind is particularly concerning in misleading citizens on the meaning of one of the most important decisions in history..."

Continue reading “No, President Biden, the Supreme Court Did Not Remove All Limits on the Presidency”

jonathanturley.org