Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (1465671)	7/1/2024 11:15:36 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573682

Bill, The ruling is clear. Why don’t you read it before digging yourself deeper in ignorance. Typical "dO yOuR oWn rEsEaRcH" bluff. ABC News couldn't explain the difference between "official act" and "unofficial act" because the ruling didn't make it clear. Even Chief Justice Roberts acknowledged this shortcoming: ***** What constitutes an 'official act' by a president? (ABC News) What constitutes an "official" versus an "unofficial" act by the president is not precisely defined in the opinion, and Chief Justice John Roberts acknowledged it could raise "difficult questions." ***** This is one of the few decisions made by the 6-3 Supreme Court that I disagree with, precisely because it leaves a LOT of wiggle room that can be taken advantage of by a postmodernist like Trump. Of course, you don't have to worry, because your definition of an "official act" will conveniently coincide with what your cult leader makes up on-the-fly. Just like everything else he argues, from classified documents to hush money payments to a pron star (that he never ever slept with, mind you). Again, this used to be known as "Clintonian logic." How does it feel to be no better than the Clintons? Tenchusatsu