Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doo who wrote (294759)	7/30/2024 11:21:26 AM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 364734

>>> That's not a comment on whether use of the word "rape" to describe what Trump was held liable for is appropriate, legally or as commonly understood by the public. The jury had two boxes, one was rape, one wasn't. The jury chose the one that wasn't rape. A person can't be clearer than that. It was NOT rape. And the judge has no right to merely deem it to have been rape after the jury said it wasn't. But the entire trial was wrong-headed starting with the bogus statute of limitations extension in a deliberate effort to entrap Trump. But the fact that key evidence was not admitted is a problem, too. I think this trial likely has a very long way go yet.

To: Doo who wrote (294759)	7/30/2024 11:47:59 AM
From: Alex MG	2 Recommendations Recommended By pocotrader rdkflorida2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 364734

Your honor, I clearly did not rape this woman. I merely pinned her against a wall and forced my fingers up her vagina. She cried for me to stop but I had the right to do it since I'm famous... I moved on her like a bitch. It's so unfair for anyone to call me a rapist... But for some reason my fans appreciate these leadership qualities I possess... In fact I could rape someone and then shoot them in the middle of 5th Ave and they would worship me as GOD.