Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1490249)	10/2/2024 12:30:18 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570969

The only thing I've made my mind up about in this regard, is that we have no statistical evidence that California management did anything that improved the outcome in that state. Being honest about it, and understanding what it takes to start businesses, I would never agree that a state has such an arbitrary right to destroy a person's business. And California thinks nothing of it. Just bad voter decisions.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1490249)	10/2/2024 12:36:36 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570969

>> Climate has nothing to do with it. Why are Michigan and Florida #6 and #7 in terms of deaths per capita, respectively? You are, of course, familiar with multivariate correlations. Two things can at one time be true. Or many more. But if you're only looking at one of the variables, you may be missing a large part of the model. What other evidence is there that the tyrannical treatment of business in California saved lives? This ranking is it?