SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (1491013)10/5/2024 6:08:02 AM
From: maceng23 Recommendations

Recommended By
IC720
longz
miraje

  Respond to of 1579940
 
There has been a real censorship problem.

The late Dr Jackie Stone speaks.

<<"The day was started prescribing Ivermectin, that was the day people stopped dying" >>




To: i-node who wrote (1491013)10/5/2024 9:55:41 AM
From: golfer721 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579940
 
TenQ is lost. The whole intent of free speech is allowing criticism against the govt. Allowing the govt to censor is ridiculous.



To: i-node who wrote (1491013)10/5/2024 8:58:49 PM
From: zax4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Doren
Eric
pocotrader
Tenchusatsu

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579940
 
Your post is naive.

X is very much a filter, an algorithmically controlled filter. And this filter is something that Musk is known to shape to force his own opinions on others. Even to promote other government's views - he actually re-posts a lot of material generated by Russian influence operations on a regular basis, for example. He forces the developers to weight his posts more heavily.

True, one can themselves override the built in Musk worshiping machine controls and influence peddling (like by blocking Musk) and shape the filter to match one's own proclivities and interests, for example through following users and liking posts. And Twitter got it's popularity, and X remains popular in this space because this ability to shape the filter and get the very latest news developments is quite good. But it is no less susceptible to US government control than corporate control and foreign influence.

Government very much has an important role in preventing crime, abuse and foreign influence.

Do you think you have some basic right to post the blueprints for a nuclear weapon? To publish US national security secrets? To post pornography and pedophilia? Who regulates this?

Your argument is tragically flawed, simplistic and naive.



To: i-node who wrote (1491013)10/6/2024 2:52:18 PM
From: Tenchusatsu3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
Doren
Eric

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579940
 
Inode,
And it cannot be the role of government to decide who can protest and who can't. Or what is truth or lies, or what can and cannot be said by the population. And that is precisely what happened four years ago when Twitter was in control.
You are such a hypocrite.

You say you don't want government deciding who can protest and who can't, yet you want Trump to pardon all the January 6th insurrectionists and punish all of the BLM rioters.

You say you don't want a government-sponsored Ministry of Tr00th, yet Trump is promising to prosecute Google for search results that he doesn't like:

Trump says he will seek Google's prosecution if he wins election (Reuters)

You say that the government made Twitter lean left, but I can assure you that no one at Twitter pre-Musk needed his or her arm twisted.

And you claim that I don't understand the concept of free speech, but I just proved that YOU don't understand it at all.

Here is the proof: You pretend like you have to go out of your way to get your daily dose of right-wing news just because of Twitter.

Give me a break. You have no idea how good you have it here in America.

Tenchusatsu