Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TMMI - Total Multimedia -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grupo Brad who wrote (7447)	2/20/1998 12:06:00 PM
From: paul goldstein	Respond to of 19109

joe, i don't have too many questions any more.. but, just for conversation. nothing else. did i understand your note correctly that they will delay trudef going to market because of lack of funds? if so, any idea what it would cost to move foward into the retail market with this product at this point? like, is it a matter of a few thousnad dollars? if so, they could sell shares in the market place to all those who want to buy at these levels and the money could go straight to tmmi and not to other sellers.. just a thought. i saw a few posters stating they like this one cent price range and it would be great for tmmi to just print more paper and sell it as stock. after all, lets not disapoint any buyers

To: Grupo Brad who wrote (7447)	2/20/1998 12:45:00 PM
From: Arnie Doolittle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19109

Grupo, I'm sure you recall my November-December postings where I suggested that all smart investors should take their tmmi losses in 1997. Nuf said on that point. As to aggravation, I'm sorry to hear about your blood pressure health problem. My best to you as you follow your doctor's advice. Me? Au contraire - no blood pressure problems. It seems that the only aggravation on this board is felt by those who want to silence me. They think that silence about tmmi's unconventional (to say the least) method of communicating and lack of response to its shareholders is preferable because then unwary lurkers will be drawn into the lair. As far as I'm concerned, I'm the "one if by land, two if by sea" guy until tmmi comes clean with its shareholders in a public forum. Have you ever attended a shareholders' meeting? Hard questions are asked all the time. In fact, I asked several at FM's annual meeting about their long-delayed lawsuit with Vons. The CEO did a brilliant two-step around my questions but I least shareholders had the chance to see his answer and evaluate his body language. While corporate officers often dodge the questions like seasoned politicians, at least the shareholders have the opportunity to hear them tell their story in a public forum where they are legally responsible for their answers (forward looking statements, etc.). May I suggest to you that I consider myself the public carrion crier while I believe that Larry Panik is the private carrion crier. Both of us are trying to accomplish the same thing - discover whether tmmi is carrion and, if so, fix responsibility for the mess we find ourselves in. When a company can't cough up a measly $7,500, a wise investor uses the sniff test: If it smells rotten, it must be rotten. From my auditing days with Coopers & Lybrand, I can tell you that when you finds worms under one rock, you find them under every rock. I wonder if a public examination of tmmi would provide enough worms (major problems) to supply all of California's trout fishermen with worms on opening day. Arnie