Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (20900)	10/12/2024 5:49:32 PM
From: Kirk ©	2 Recommendations Recommended By berniel Return to Sender Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26710

I remember some used to argue with me in 2000 that AMAT was such a better company than LRCX.... yet it took 6 or 7 years LONGER than LRCX to pass its 2000 bubble peak. I owned both and took a ton of profits in both but during the bubble deflation, I put more into LRCX than AMAT... and more recently, AMAT has offered GREAT value as its scorching was so severe, I bought some shares for my ROTH when it had a 4.0% yield! . Great stocks to have core positions in but you make a lot more trading the volatility around the core positions. .