Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1499780)

11/7/2024 4:31:43 PM

From: koan

Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1570272

You don't seem to understand how science is done.

Scientist value their reputations and so are very careful with their work.

And the thousands of atmospheric scientists around the world talk to each other and compare research all the time.

That constant communication and research is way tooo big for anyone to control.

And the world's scientists say it is settled.

How can you think the average Joe can figure it out better than the scientists?????

My son in law was in school for about eight years studying at a U of Calfironia school and studied that subject, with advanced math, chemistry and physics.

So advanced he teachea those subjects at a major university.

The idea Joe Blow knows more than he and the other scientists is nuts.

<

The "scientific data" has, for political reasons, been dinkered with.

When debate is disallowed as you don't like the results being examined, any claim to "science" is lost.

Saying "we know best" is not valid scientific discussion either.

<<Of the 302 [weather] sites quoted, over one third (103) do NOT exist. The Met Office declined to advise me exactly how or from where the alleged “data” was derived for these 102 non-existent sites.>>

Letter to Peter Kyle MP – Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology. | Tallbloke's Talkshop