Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (1499783)	11/7/2024 5:20:48 PM
From: Bill	4 Recommendations Recommended By Bonefish longz miraje Thomas M. Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570088

And the world's scientists say it is settled. No they don't. Politicians say that. Real scientists keep researching and testing their hypotheses.

To: koan who wrote (1499783)	11/7/2024 6:15:58 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By Fiscally Conservative Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570088

Koan, And the world's scientists say it is settled. Do you realize that sEtTlEd sCiEnCe is part of the reason why Trump won? Do you realize that sEtTlEd sCiEnCe is the reason why the Q Continuum exists in the first place? Do you realize that sEtTlEd sCiEnCe is the reason why Trump voters don't even trust ANY scientific expert these days? The death of scientific institutions represents a crisis of trust that the left continued to deny until now. We're going to see guys like RFQ Jr. and the Muskperger destroy these institutions and replace them with their crazy-ass ideas backed by the dumbest but most viral "experts" they can scrounge up from X. Tenchusatsu

To: koan who wrote (1499783)	11/7/2024 10:22:18 PM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570088

If your scientists know anything at all they can afford to lose the "nanny knows best" attitude, and so can you. It is as simple as golfer says. Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board - Msg: 34898678 and so to the WEF. Global Risks 2024: Disinformation Tops Global Risks 2024 as Environmental Threats Intensify > Press releases \| World Economic Forum Oh wait... does that say 2/3rds? I thought <<all>> the scientists agreed on the same thing? You are so FOS on this matter ! Maybe you ought to check out the history of science a little? You may learn something. Below is a very quick google search. I highlighted a single sentence in *red* for you to focus on, as your brain seems to be asleep. AI Overview Learn more…Opens in new tab Karl Popper's views on the history of science include: Science is a history of errors Science is a history of error, but it's also one of the few human activities where errors are systematically criticized and corrected. Science is progressive Science is progressive because errors are corrected, and scientists learn from their mistakes. Science is critical Science should be more critical of itself and its discoveries. Popper's theory of critical rationality encourages scientists to try to prove their theories false. Science is falsification Science is about falsification, not confirmation. Scientists should actively search for evidence that refutes their hypotheses. Science is provisional All scientific knowledge is provisional and conjectural. Universal scientific theories can't be conclusively established. Science is based on critical thinking Critical thinking is the essence of rationality in science. It's the only way to eliminate false theories and determine which ones are best. Quote by Karl R. Popper: “The history of science, like the history of all...” Popper, Karl: Philosophy of Science \| Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy and watch this....