Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Donald Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (61287)	12/24/2024 8:21:20 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	1 Recommendation Recommended By Stock Puppy Respond to of 73907

Great question... Right now, we don't have the right to take it without negotiating for it... The reason Greenland is important to the United States is that it's a key strategic and military location for the U.S. and would provide us with a location for military personnel and supplies without the authorization of any foreign interests that could stand in our way... While we already have a military base in Greenland, we could still be asked to leave at any time... On the other hand, if we owned Greenland then no one could ask us to leave if that eventuality ever actually occurred... Excellent question!!! GZ

To: John Carragher who wrote (61287)	12/25/2024 5:16:23 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	2 Recommendations Recommended By Stock Puppy Thehammer Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 73907

I thought about my reply to your question, I want to be sure to emphasis that in no way does Donald intend to "take" the country, he's not planning on stealing it... It would be purchased and for a very handsome price which would be more than satisfactory to the Kingdom of Denmark and to The Danish monarchy... It would not be a hostile move in any way but a very friendly exchange... I just wanted to make that very clear... GZ