SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (210305)1/17/2025 6:18:48 PM
From: Julius Wong1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217580
 
GM banned from sharing driving and location data with insurance companies

techcrunch.com



To: TobagoJack who wrote (210305)1/17/2025 10:23:43 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Read Replies (7) | Respond to of 217580
 
for some strange reason, that I still do NOT understand, tik tok became such a controversy.. I suppose it's the data part.. since you apparently cannot join it anyomously. why, cuz you pay to see teen agers showing off their bodies for which they get some bucks if they are popular, like the best girls in a strip club once upon a time.

the teens call it, making content LOL. They all fucking talk about "content" like they are television program producers.

It's fanatical, strange, weird, warped and.......... true.

OnlyFans............... I presume a usa based tik tok style platform to some degree. same thing.

all kinds of horny people are expressing themselves for other horny people who get off on what they express and are willing to pay some money to watch it, i.e. the content.

it's a digital strip club man. hosted on a world wide server aka broadcasting medium.

WTF?

WTF?

Hello?

These companies enable world wide masterbation and strip tease in a non public setting and nobody touches nobody. What's the problemo?



To: TobagoJack who wrote (210305)1/18/2025 8:15:17 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217580
 
Re <<Tik Tok>> … a tragedy, for American people’s livelihood involved (owners, staff, service providers, advertisers, and subscribers/creators), and a company owned mostly by one group of American oligarchs is put in danger, in favor of another group of American oligarchs …




To: TobagoJack who wrote (210305)1/18/2025 12:22:07 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217580
 
I would enforce ban on TT.

Its relationship with the CCP is real.

Your synthesis of Wikipedia’s note failed to mention Zhang Fuping, who is BD’s liaison with the CCP.

I’d ban any social media owned or related to our adversaries.

Short, simple.

TT users will get used to it. Trump is a lame duck starting on 1.21 so no political risk.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (210305)1/18/2025 1:41:47 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217580
 
I see that you now use CPC instead of more commonly used CCP.

A very interesting article re same, highlighting the ridiculous. Amusing discussion about the apparatchik’s fervid discussions.

chinamediaproject.org

lol!