Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Data Race (NASDAQ: RACE) NEWS! 2 voice/data/fax: ONE LINE! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BishopsChild who wrote (28117)	2/22/1998 9:37:00 PM
From: Kashish King	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33268

Jemuel, I think we could agree that the only explanation for keeping a list of year-old posts is some form of dementia, senility perhaps, and that leads me to believe that you are not the originator of that post. Can you imagine your whole life revolving around the performance of one stock? Can you imagine sitting around collecting obscure, almost meaningless posts so that you can run them again after your stock has plummeted to almost 10% of it's all-time high? Is that some sort of deep entertainment that we cannot hope to comprehend? Perhaps it's not a person at all, perhaps it's... it's a machine run amok! I can't come up with another explanation, any insight you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

To: BishopsChild who wrote (28117)	2/22/1998 10:03:00 PM
From: Kashish King	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33268

What's particularly troubling to me is how the unit is constantly brings up POTS as though that somehow spells success for BT. I really see that as the core lie which has been told about this company and I am concerned that more innocent victims will fall prey to that story. The reasons for BT's failure are crystal clear: 1. Proprietary hardware and software on both ends. 2. No new functionality over standard modems.* 3. Heavy competition. It seems that every week there is yet another remote access product and by far the market appears to be concentrated around work-at-home users with ISDN connections. The johnny-come-lately entry of RACE is simply too little, too late and does little to address the inherent problems of items 1., 2. and 3. in the aforementioned enumeration. I see little hope for BT going forward and only a glimmer of hope for the company in general. Sorry if these observations are painful but you'll be thanking for them later. ...users can have three connections operating simultaneously--a fax call, a voice call and a data call, for example. zdnet.com * Note that I do not consider limited simultaneity at the cost of severely degraded performance for any given function to be new functionality.