Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1521369)

2/10/2025 2:52:48 PM

From: Wharf Rat

1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Eric

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573006

"Rather then pin it all on CO2, the discussion should really be opened up to what all scientists say"

All GHGs contribute. All scientists? It's gonna be a long time before that happens, but there is a consensus from about 99.99% of them.

--

"you cannot bar the ones that criticise a certain pet theory"

It's very easy to criticize in the media, but so far it's been impossible to disprove in scientific literature, cuz no one has actually been able to do that. The unit "angstrom" was given out as a participation trophy to Knut, who came the closest.

In 1896, the Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius (pictured) realized that carbon dioxide traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere. A rebuttal by the Swedish physicist Knut Ångström, now known to be incorrect, stymied study of climate change for several decades. https://t.co/ibXosC1Btk pic.twitter.com/gA76LPJZB6
— Quanta Magazine (@QuantaMagazine) August 16, 2024