Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1521381)	2/10/2025 3:20:47 PM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573050

<<impossible to disprove in scientific literature>> Science deals with what is most likely. A disproof, or proof is for mathematics. Richard Feynman: The Likelihood of Flying Saucers \| Open Culture Cosmic Particles, charged and otherwise, are a well known fact. They happen all the time, and the flux of them can vary, for a large number of reasons, not just random interstellar encounters. We are passing though space where the density of them could change. They can have a huge effect on Climate, just by seeding cloud formation. That is just one possible variable. The are many others no doubt. So the Scientific literature should reflect on those possibilities. If it doesn't then some thing is wrong. Very wrong imho. That appears to be the case at the moment. We are sliding into the next Ice Age per the Milankovitch cycles. We should really also study outcomes if a sudden cooling trend sets in. This makes normal sense to a lot of open minded type people. More confirmation of Tonga's epic 2023/24 warming spike, which will be useful in my next Tonga Talk on Feb 20 in The Villages, FL. https://t.co/UUYqHMfr38 — John Shewchuk (@_ClimateCraze) February 8, 2025