SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (212566)3/28/2025 10:36:55 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218000
 
re <<serenity>>

zerohedge.com

SPX Rejected at 200DMA - Is This the Beginning of the End?

BY THE MARKET EAR

SATURDAY, MAR 29, 2025 - 5:26

Not even oversold

SPX reversed right on the 200 day and is putting in a massive down candle. RSI not even oversold. Not looking bueno...



Source: Refinitiv

VIX stress

VIX moving sharply to the upside, but still far from recent "panic" levels. Chart shows SPX and VIX (inverted).



Source: Refinitiv

Fear - not everywhere

VIX surging....while skew remains well behaved. The theme of people selling longs, and not paying up for downside protection remains intact.



Source: Refinitiv

Imagine...

High uncertainty raises the ‘potential volatility’ of the system....



Source: Soc Gen

HYG stress

HYG Skew at 99%ile.



Source: Nomura

Falling fundamentally

US corporate profits optimism is now falling.



Source: Soc Gen/Edwards

2nd worst president ever...?

The chart shows that for all the post-inauguration periods since 1937 (when the current January 20th date was fixed), this year has been flirting with being the second-worst for the S&P out of 23 election cycles. 2001 is the worst, back when the stock market collapse accelerated following the dot com bubble.



Source: Deutsche Bank

Lagnificent

Hartnett sums it up: "US equities have led global equities & Magnificent 7 stocks have led US equities past 2 years; Magnificent 7 peaked at 35% of S&P 500 market cap in Dec'24 (up from 20% in Jan’23), set to become "Lagnificent 7" in '25".



Source: BofA

Sensitive households

Stocks at record 29% of US household financial assets.



Source: BofA

That was quick

Amazing how the US exceptionalism trade died so quickly.


Source: Nomura

1 and 99

Needs little commenting...




To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (212566)3/28/2025 10:37:03 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Respond to of 218000
 
re <<serenity>> shall be up-levelled once gold touches US$ 4,000 and GDX / GDXJ crosses 2X previous ATH

gold is a cure for many ailments, and troubled mind is one, am told

the metal is so, or soooooooooo, magical

what posts follow are a clippings from behind the curtain, and they should fortify tranquility

zerohedge.com

Goldman's "April 2nd Game Plan" In Eight Trades

BY TYLER DURDEN

SATURDAY, MAR 29, 2025 - 07:22 AM

As we reported earlier this week (see " Goldman Warns Market Expectations For Trump's April 2 Reciprocal Tariffs Are Far Too Optimistic") Goldman’s house view on the April 2 reciprocal tariffs, aka "Liberation Day", is more bearish than market expectations, and one explanation for today's selling is that clients are taking off risk because listed products are not capturing the trade fear dynamics efficiently.

So with just a few days left until next week's key event, the bank's thematic research team shares its preferred trades ahead of April 2nd tariff announcements:

  • Short companies at risk to tariffs (GS24TRFS and GSCNSTAR)
  • Long companies that benefit from onshoring trends (GSXUSHOR) vs Short companies that would face challenges if they are unable to move operations to the US (GSXUOFFS)
  • Long Republican policy outperformers (GS24REPL) vs Short Republican policy underperformers (GS24REPS).
  • Short cyclicals ex commods (GSXUCYCL) vs Long defensives ex commods (GSXUDEFS)
  • Long domestic sales (GSXUAMER) vs Short international sales (GSXUINTL)
  • Long US metals (GSXUMETL) vs Short US autos (GSXUDRIV)
  • Short health care companies exposed to Ireland (GSHLCIRL)
  • Long megacap tech companies (GSTMTMEG)
Let's take a closer look at each of these, but first we start with a recap of what we wrote on Tuesday, namely the views of Goldman's political analyst, Alec Phillips, whose take on the looming tariffs was as follows: (1) officials anticipate negotiations with trade partners after April 2nd, (2) GIR’s recent survey shows investors expect a 9pp reciprocal tariff rate on average, and (3) we expect April 2nd tariff announcements to trigger a negative surprise effect on markets.

[url=][/url]

When Goldman asked its clients how they expect their risk allocation to change into April 2nd tariff announcement, the majority answered they have cut risk and do not intend to add (107 votes).

[url=][/url]

Which bring us to Goldman's preferred trades starting with the most obvious one:

1. Short companies at risk to tariffs

Tariff-sensitive pockets of the market (GS24TRFS and GSCNSTAR) have experienced a technical rebound since mid-March. Goldman likes these baskets considering their fundamentals are at risk if tariffs are imposed. GS24TRFS consists of US companies across multiple sectors that have multi-regional supply chains. This is Goldman's favorite implementation to hedge uncertainty around tariff policies. Goldman's research points out that 15 trading partners account for 90% of imports and more than 100% of the trade deficit.

[url=][/url]

2. Long companies that benefit from onshoring trends and short companies that could face challenges due to significant offshore exposure

Companies are once again encouraged to move operations to the US. Goldman likes its onshoring pair (GSPUSHOR) for the following reasons: (1) any company moving operations to the US is supporting higher capex levels for players enabling onshoring trends (non-residential construction, manufacturing facilities automation, etc…), and (2) while the new administration is being frugal, Trump did mention a potential infrastructure bill during the inauguration:

[url=][/url]

Goldman's onshoring pair is rebalancing today to reduce exposure to AI, adjust for tariff sensitivity, and refresh liquidity. The new pair has onshoring winners growing earnings at a faster pace but are cheaper than companies that could face challenges in this environment. GSXUSHOR is composed of companies that help enable companies to more operations onshore, diversified across non-residential construction companies involved in building manufacturing facilities, automation, transportation, and companies that have moved operations domestically. GSXUOFFS consists of companies at risk to tariffs because of how global their manufacturing footprint is.

[url=][/url]

3. Long Republican policy outperformers and short Republican policy underperformers

Republican policy outperformers vs underperformers (GS24REPL vs GS24REPS) is trading near election day levels, but are still ~10% away from election results highs. We started the year with high growth expectations, multiple rate cuts scheduled, and an overall positive outlook mainly driven by the new administration. But investors are not seeing this yet. Instead, the administration is focused first on tariffs, government spending cuts, and immigration reform while deregulation, tax cuts, AI and infrastructure spending are still in progress. Growth fears driven by recent economic data as well as current policy focus has unwound all gains since the election in the Goldman Republican Policy Outperformers vs Underperformers pair (GSP24REP). This is an opportunity to buy the dip considering the bank continues to have high conviction in the new administration’s de-regulation plans, AI and Infrastructure spending plans. It is a matter of when, and not a matter of if.

[url=][/url]

4. Short cyclicals and long defensives excluding commodity exposure

Cyclicals vs Defensives ex commodities have rebounded in the last couple of days and are not pricing in growth above GS forecasts for 2025 (Credit to Jenny Ma in GS equity strategy research for this chart)

[url=][/url]

5. Long companies with high domestic sales and short companies with high international sales

In the scenario where a trade war escalates, Goldman would go long companies that have primarily US sales exposure, in the case where trade partners decide to reduce purchases from US listed companies

[url=][/url]

The bank's dollar sensitive pair provides more extreme exposure to sales % domestically vs internationally in comparison to the S&P 500

[url=][/url]

6. Long US metals and short US autos ex TSLA

Goldman has noticed investors targeting specific industries, by going long US metals and going short US autos, excluding TSLA. GS research sent an update earlier this week, exploring Trump’s incremental 25% tariff on autos and certain auto parts.

[url=][/url]

7. Short health care companies exposed to Ireland

Healthcare investors have been intensely focused on the prospect of pharmaceutical tariffs this week following Trump’s comments during his cabinet meeting on Monday pointing to an update in the “near future”. Investor focus following these comments centered in around exposure to Ireland – given the country’s significant manufacturing footprint and/or domiciling for a broad array of the healthcare sector. On the back of this focus, Goldman put together a basket of healthcare stocks with exposure to the country from a manufacturing, IP and/or domiciling perspective – based on its review of public disclosures, footprint analyses and our conversations through the week on this theme.

[url=][/url]

8. Long megacap tech companies:

MegaCap tech, i.e., Mag 7 and the likes (GSTMTMEG) valuation premium over the market is reaching the lowest level in the last decade. Pretty much the entire Goldman trading desk likes going long Megacap tech at these levels.

[url=][/url]

Here is the performance of megacap tech performance relative to the S&P 500 following the trough on relative valuations: quite bullish for mega tech.

[url=][/url]



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (212566)3/28/2025 10:45:10 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218000
 
re <<serenity>> ... goes well with ecstasy in pairing, much as wood good entree with proper wine




zerohedge.com

Gold Surges To Best Start To A Year Since 1986 As Stagflation Scare Slams Stocks In Q1

BY TYLER DURDEN

SATURDAY, MAR 29, 2025 - 04:00 AM

Q1 saw a big Global Asset ‘Regional Rebalancing', with money into “Fiscal Expansionists” and stimulators / easers i.e. Europe & China, and money out of “Fiscal Contractionists” i.e. United States as “source of funds”...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

With one trading day left in the month/quarter - can Monday save the bulls?

Domestically, stagflationary signals grew louder this morning with weaker than expected consumer spending, hotter than expected Core PCE, and surging inflation expectations (thanks to Democrats freaking out)...

[url=][/url]

...and if there's one chart to sum up Q1, it is this one - Goldman's Long/Short Stagflation basket has exploded higher...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

The (stock) markets did not like that double whammy of higher inflation and slower growth (even though we wonder why all those Democrats - who are so terrified of higher prices - are not already spending their money now before Trump's terrible tariffs erase their purchasing power?) plunging today, erasing the week's gains...

As Goldman's trading desk noted - Today felt like a sell everything type of session with > 400 names trading lower in the S&P and a session which has the makings of a low-tick close type of day. The pace of supply both here and from conversations feels a bit more aggressive than of late.

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

...and that dragged all the majors into the red for Q1 with Nasdaq the biggest loser...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

With today's losses the SPX is now on track for the worst quarter since Q3 '22 (and only the 2nd losing quarter since then). It's different this time... for now...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

AI has been a shitshow in Q1, triggered initially by the DeepSeek drop...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

The next week is heavy with event risk and the vol markets know it...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

The second chart to sum up Q1 is the growing divergence between strong hard data and weak soft data...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

Interestingly both growth and inflation macro measures are lower in Q1 (today's PCE beat is evident at the end) - this is not stagflation (the inflation fears seem more in the soft data than the hard data br0adly speaking... for now)...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

Rate cut expectations are significantly higher from the start of Q1... which could well be overly dovish given the stagflationary signals...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

However, Treasury yields tumbled today - growth concerns trumping inflation fears - having dropped significantly in Q1, with the belly outperforming...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

Credit markets started to crack in Q1, notably decoupling from equity risk for now...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

Q1 saw relentless hedging for wider spreads in High Yield ETFs on perception of economic slowdown “cycle turn” risks building - HYG Skew at 99%ile

[url=][/url]

The dollar ended Q1 lower, but found support at its 200DMA...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

Oil prices ended the month unchanged but are lower YTD...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

Q1 was disaster for crypto, with big gainers like Solano and Ethereum erasing the post-election gains...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

Bitcoin was lower in Q1 but it is still well above the pre-election levels. Today's tumble broke BTC back below its 200DMA...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

Silver prices soared in Q1, back above $34...

[url=][/url]

Finally, saving the best for last, Gold surged over 16% in Q1, its best start to a year since 1986...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

...as the barbarous relic topped $3080 - a new record high - today...

[url=][/url]

Source: Bloomberg

Is gold demand signaling the end of the U.S. Exceptionalism era?