SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Torben Noerup Nielsen who wrote (15732)2/23/1998 7:14:00 PM
From: tonyt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
With all the talk of 'merger-mania' (and posts, upon posts, upon posts from every news source by one of our 'threadsters'), I'm suprised (well, not really) that this has not been posted yet:

February 23, 1998

SmithKline, Glaxo End Talks
On Merger of Drug Giants

An INTERACTIVE JOURNAL News Roundup

SmithKline Beecham PLC and Glaxo Wellcome PLC terminated merger
discussions because the companies have been unable to agree on the
terms of a possible deal.

SmithKline Beecham's board unanimously decided against recommending
to shareholders a merger in which the company would have been the
junior partner. Glaxo officials late Monday also confirmed the deal was
off.

On Jan. 30, SmithKline had announced it was calling off talks with
American Home Products Corp. in favor of a potential deal with Glaxo,
sending the stocks of both British pharmaceutical companies surging. The
deal would have been the among the largest corporate mergers in history
and created the biggest drug company in the world with combined sales of
$27 billion.

SmithKline Beecham said its board "is aware of the significance of this
decision, particularly in light of the Jan. 30 public announcement [of the
talks] and the substantial increase in the market capitalization of both SB
and Glaxo."

SmithKline Beecham said that after careful consideration, however, the
board unanimously decided that it was unable to recommend the proposed
merger to its shareholders. SmithKline Beecham said its board no longer
believed that the merged group would be able to operate in such a way as
to produce superior performance for shareholders.

The companies earlier agreed that the board of the combined group would
be drawn from the boards of both companies. In addition, five executive
directors were named.

SmithKline said that before the announcement, there had been discussions
and agreement in relation to the roles of the five executive directors.

Discussions reaffirming the agreed key management roles took place on a
number of occasions between the parties after the announcement.

SmithKline said that on Feb. 20, Glaxo indicated that it was not prepared
to proceed on the agreed basis.

In discussions since then, SmithKline said Glaxo "has been unwilling to
proceed in accordance with the agreed arrangements."

SmithKline said discussions since Feb. 20 have revealed "a number of
differences between the companies," including differences in the approach
to the possible merger, management philosophy and corporate culture.

The company said Glaxo's recent conduct of these discussions "has
inevitably strained relations between the two companies."

SmithKline said its board has unanimously reached the view that
"insurmountable differences" have arisen which would undermine the
effective management of the merged group and impair its ability to deliver
the shareholder value creation fundamental to the merger.

For its part, Glaxo issued a one-sentence press release stating that
"discussions on the proposed merger with SmithKline Beecham PLC have
been terminated."

The news came after the markets closed in New York.

SmithKline American depositary receipts fell 25 cents Monday on the
New York Stock Exchange to close at $66, while Glaxo American
depositary receipts fell 31.25 cents to close at 62.4375.
Return to top of page
Copyright c 1998 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.