Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DJB who wrote (7585)	2/24/1998 2:30:00 PM
From: Ed Pettee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10368

DJB--I don't have a good answer for you on that subject. This morning I was talking to a contact at the Coin Operators Association who was getting ready to testify in favor of Video poker before a sub-committe e for the Senate. They keep a daily pulse on each of the Senators. I asked him about Senators Short and Peeler who Tod Allen had mentioned in his post # 7577. He informed me that Senator Short stands against Video Poker and Senator Peeler is in favor. Peeler represents the district with 3 counties that voted against the referendum in 94. However, as Tod pointed out in his recent post Peeler's York county which he represents is #4 in the state for revenue. This is the county that backs up to the Charlotte North Carolina county and gets a lot of play from out of state. He also said the swing in the Senate on trying to stop the filibuster is still between 3-4 votes.