Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Qone0 who wrote (1540568)	5/29/2025 1:15:00 PM
From: Bonefish	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1583647

General motors and Ford probably wouldn't exist today without tariffs. But those weren't Trump's tariffs so they are good. Amirite?

To: Qone0 who wrote (1540568)	5/29/2025 2:50:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583647

Qone0, Tariffs are a tax on consumers. No matter who puts it on. Yes, but Bonefish is justifying bad policy with whataboutisms. "But but whatabout that tariff from 1969 on light trucks?" "But but whatabout that Chinese EV tariff?" Are they really beneficial to the American economy? Do they really "level the playing field," as the MAGA cultists claim without any elaboration whatsoever? Or do they just bring them up because they think two wrongs make a right? Tenchu's Thoughts - Wrong Policy, Wrong Data, Wrong Implementation by the Wrong Man Tenchusatsu