Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (28759)	2/24/1998 1:26:00 PM
From: Reginald Middleton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572942

<This recent graduate with castrated education is not capable to understand you.> If you were following the discussion, you would have realized that your friend has yet to prove a point. I forgive your rudeness anyway. <It also seems to me that his excessive activity on this thread has some hidden purpose (in addition to the obvious purpose to sell his "consulting" web-service to newbies).> Let's get this straight so there will be no misunderstaning. I deal with institutions - banks, treasury departments, funds, etc. What I do has absolutely no market in SI patrons. In addition, you will find absolutely nothing for sale on my site. I post here for the fun of it and to share in the expertise of the scientific & technical constituency on the thread, like I am sure you do. This being said, it would be greatly appreciated if would refrain from your ad hominem attacks. <Brand value, current capital, patents, human apital, FAB's, work completed under the constuction of new fabs, etc.> These are exactly the Intel's "assets" that all Intel investors are whinning about as "undervalued". Like I said before, assets are assets. INTC does not have an exclusive on them, but they do have more of them than AMD. Does this somehow uncover some sort of collusion or secret conspiracy. You had better add KO, MSFT, and a whole host of other companies to your conspiracy theory as well.

To: Ali Chen who wrote (28759)	2/24/1998 2:24:00 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572942

Ali you are right about Regy but he made a number of statements about amd value while claiming to be an expert. I just wanted to show that his knowledge of modern valuations is primitive to say at least and hence his analysis of AMD is worthless. I am not sure what's up with AMD now but I have not heard anything yet. I hate to speculate but it is not like amd to limit public info for so long, Jerry likes spotlight way to much. I sure hope that it is not a takeover. It's not the best possible time for shareholders, IMHO. Regards -Albert