SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/17/2025 9:11:15 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217541
 
re <<watch this interview>>

... watching your citation, had the channel on subscription but always good to be pointed, for I have well over 100 channels on call.

the program seems to go well with pairing here under

On another front Team Taiwan might just have decided to sacrifice its semiconductor industry one or another way by making such useless or use-less to Team China, especially as Team USA about to be MAGA distracted by war against Iran even as Europe not actually setup to defend the Ukrainian front

bloomberg.com

US-China Tech Fight Widens After Taiwan Blacklists Huawei


A Huawei Technologies Co. store in Shanghai.

Photographer: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg

By Mackenzie Hawkins, Miaojung Lin, and Yian Lee

June 18, 2025 at 3:05 AM GMT+8


    • Taiwan has blacklisted Huawei Technologies Co. and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp., barring its firms from doing business with them without a license, in a move to curtail China's technological ascent.
    • The decision marks a departure from Taiwan's policy of nurturing cross-Strait business ties and may be the first of a series of measures tightening the flow of technology to China.
    • The move is seen as a signal of Taiwan's shift towards strategic technological competition with China, and may be part of a broader effort to reduce economic interdependence between China and Taiwan.
    Summary by Bloomberg AI
Taiwan joined a yearslong US campaign to curtail China’s technological ascent when it blacklisted the country’s AI and chipmaking champions, an unprecedented step that may signal a resurgent effort to isolate its powerful neighbor’s semiconductor sector.

Taipei this month added Huawei Technologies Co. and its main chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. to its entity list, barring the island’s firms from doing business with the pair without a license. It was the first time Taiwanese officials have used that blacklist to sanction major Chinese firms, taking a cue from a longstanding US approach of blocking access to advanced technologies.

The move also marks Taipei’s first public action on semiconductor restrictions since President Lai Ching-te pledged in April to address unspecified concerns from Washington about export controls. President Donald Trump’s administration has urged Taipei to take more ownership over chip restrictions on China, people familiar with the matter said, with a particular focus on enforcement of existing curbs. They requested anonymity as they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.


Lai Ching-te
Photographer: An Rong Xu/Bloomberg

A congressional committee focused on China, meanwhile, said after Taipei’s move that the US “must continue working with our partners to ensure the CCP’s attempts to illegally transfer tech are stopped cold.”

Taipei’s decision may be the first of a series of measures tightening the flow of technology to China, marking a departure from a policy of nurturing cross-Strait business ties. The longer-term goal may be to throttle supply of the vital components, silicon materials and plant construction expertise that helped transform Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. into the world’s most advanced chip operation.

“This recent shift marks a substantive move toward strategic technological competition with China,” said Chiang Min-yen, an analyst at Taiwan’s government-funded Research Institute for Democracy, Society and Emerging Technology. “Compared to other tech democracies with similar industrial structures — such as Japan and South Korea — Taiwan is now taking a more decisive stance.”

Lai didn’t specify in his April comments what steps Taiwan would take in response to US concerns, but instead described a broader strategy to boost trade relations with the US. It’s unclear whether the Huawei and SMIC sanctions are related to ongoing tariff negotiations with Washington, or whether the US requested that specific step. The US Department of Commerce, White House, Taiwan’s Office of Trade Negotiations and China’s Foreign Ministry didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The US has pressured Taiwan to do more since Trump’s first term, when officials urged Taipei to block sales of TSMC chips to China — before Washington imposed restrictions on some of TSMC’s shipments to the world’s second-largest economy.

Under President Joe Biden, the US continually ramped up those China controls, which span both chips and the tools used to make them. Many of the US measures use an authority known as the foreign direct product rule to restrict some activities of foreign firms — including Taiwanese ones — whose products contain even the tiniest bit of American tech.

One major focus for American officials — under Trump as well as his predecessor — is ensuring that Taipei cracks down on TSMC sales that are restricted under US rules, said people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named discussing private conversations.

Last year, TSMC, the go-to chipmaker for Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp., unwittingly manufactured 2.9 million AI dies for Huawei, based on estimates from researchers. Those semiconductors were routed via an intermediary that has since been sanctioned by the US government and cut off by TSMC, which is cooperating with Washington’s ongoing investigation into the matter.


TSMC campus in Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Photographer: An Rong Xu/Bloomberg

But there also are a host of other business activities not captured by Washington’s curbs — things like construction contracts or sales of certain components. In 2023, Bloomberg News reported that several Taiwanese companies were helping Huawei build infrastructure for an under-the-radar network of chip plants across southern China.

Taiwanese officials said they would probe into those companies shortly after, but they’ve refrained from taking significant action — until now.

It’s unusual for Beijing’s neighbors, who still see China as a crucial trading partner, to openly target its most strategic companies. While Japan joined a US-led campaign to limit China’s access to advanced chipmaking equipment, neither Tokyo nor Seoul has blacklisted Huawei or SMIC entirely.

On its face, Taiwan’s entity list action doesn’t immediately upend routine business, in part because it doesn’t apply to mainland-registered operations. Many Taiwanese companies have set up local subsidiaries to handle their business in mainland China over the years, and Taipei doesn’t have jurisdiction over such entities.

“I don’t expect this announcement will cause any material impact for either Taiwan or Huawei and SMIC,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Steven Tseng. “Huawei and SMIC don’t really rely on Taiwan as they should have established a pretty decent level of ‘local sourcing’ in China after all these years.”

It’s the signal Lai is sending that’s important.

The new president has been working to reduce economic interdependence between China and Taiwan. His Democratic Progressive Party released a video over the weekend arguing that Taiwanese companies should look to diversify away from China — a shift from decades of the island’s firms establishing a substantial presence on the mainland. Foxconn Technology Group built the world’s largest iPhone assembly campus in central China, while TSMC runs chipmaking sites in Shanghai and Nanjing.

Taiwan's annual investments into China peaked in 2010

Source: Taiwan's Ministry of Economic Affairs

Tensions escalated after Lai was elected last year. Beijing has accused him of seeking independence and destabilizing the region. Bilateral ties were further strained after Lai labeled China a “foreign hostile force” for the first time and unveiled wide-ranging measures to counter infiltration efforts. China claims the self-governing democracy is its territory and has vowed to unify with Taiwan, using force if necessary — a stance Taiwan rejects.

Taiwan’s annual investment in China peaked at $14.6 billion in 2010, though that spending plummeted to $3.6 billion last year.

“Lai will now be able to speed up his agenda-setting against China on several fronts including defense, trade and tech, thanks to the changes in the global environment,” said Soong Hseik-wen, director of the Center for National Policy Research at Taiwan’s National Chung Cheng University.

— With assistance from Debby Wu and Catherine Lucey



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/17/2025 11:11:28 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217541
 
i'm pretty much gone if any single one of you has not rec'd that interview post.

seriously gone.

it's the best you can get for free how do you invest or protect assets at this point.

unless you simply have no home work at all so that you can't grasp it.

gimme some recs babes. or I am going.

for those you can't, glad you enjoyed the entertainment. LOL.

for those who want? and care and have money on the line?

best interview 100% you should see in full.

no recs..

I am so fucking done.



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/17/2025 11:57:51 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217541
 
we are in a game without null-position,
none allowed to quit,
all must play 24 x 7,
few allowed to win,
fewer still allowed to keep winnings,
rules change all the time, anytime, mostly against us
3, 2, ... play

player 4 just met first-blood and left the chat
etc etc



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/18/2025 12:03:24 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217541
 
speaking of gaming,

bloomberg.com

Trump Is Driving Off Investors and Threatening the Dollar’s Reign
The president’s economic agenda is dragging down the dollar and making it more difficult for the US to finance its deficits.


Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick listen to President Donald Trump.

Photographer: Jabin Botsford/Getty Images

By Carter Johnson, Saleha Mohsin, and Ruth Carson

June 18, 2025 at 7:35 AM GMT+8

    • The US dollar has lost over 10% of its value against the euro, pound, and Swiss franc since President Donald Trump took office, and is down against every major currency.
    • The Trump administration's policies, including tariff hikes, tax cuts, and pressure on the Federal Reserve, are driving investors away and contributing to the dollar's decline.
    • The dollar's fall could lead to a vicious cycle of dollar and deficit concerns, prompting foreigners to repatriate their money, driving up borrowing costs, and compounding fiscal woes.
    Summary by Bloomberg AI

There is no better barometer of global investors’ repudiation of President Donald Trump’s policies than the dollar. Since he took office, it’s lost more than 10% of its value against the euro, pound and Swiss franc and is down against every single major currency in the world.

The last time the dollar plunged this much, this fast was in 2010, when the Federal Reserve was frantically printing money to prop up the economy in the wake of the financial crisis. This time, it’s several of the key pillars of the Trump agenda that are driving investors away: the across-the-board tariff hikes that shocked allies and upended trade; the push to ram through tax cuts that would add to bloated deficits and debt; the pressure campaign to get the Fed to slash interest rates; and the bare-knuckled legal tactics employed against those who oppose his policies.


A screen displaying the rate of the yen against the US dollar.
Photographer: Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg

What’s surprising to long-time market observers is the Trump team’s seeming indifference to the dollar’s plunge. Sure, they’ll state their support for a “strong dollar” when asked by reporters and lawmakers, as their predecessors have for decades, but they’re doing little to try to halt its decline. If anything, there’s a sense among traders that the administration wants to keep devaluing the dollar to buoy US manufacturing — even sparking chatter at one point that it’s making exchange-rate levels part of tariff negotiations with trading partners. Right or wrong, that speculation is causing wild swings in the dollar, like when it crashed 4% against the Taiwan dollar in just over an hour last month.

This is a dangerous game: The government’s annual financing needs have skyrocketed to over $4 trillion after years of runaway budget deficits. Much of that financing comes from foreign creditors, and the more the dollar sinks, the bigger the losses they suffer when converting their investments back into their local currencies.

“Trump is definitely playing with fire,“ says Stephen Miller, a consultant for GSFM, a unit of Canada’s CI Financial Corp. in Australia.

At some point, if things get bad enough, a sort of vicious cycle could kick in. Dollar and deficit concerns prompt foreigners to repatriate their money, which drives up borrowing costs and compounds both the dollar declines and fiscal woes, which then in turn heighten these worries and so on and so on.

Few are predicting that will actually happen — the US has always found ways to pull itself out of financial holes in the past — and yet few are willing to rule it out either. It’s the sort of risk that has long tormented finance officials in developing nations across the world. But for the US, the pre-eminent global power and proprietor of the world’s most-coveted currency, it’s a new financial reality that hasn’t quite sunk in.

Miller, who used to run Australian fixed-income markets for BlackRock Inc., is among those who suspect the Trump administration, or at least factions of it, may indeed be rooting for a weaker dollar. “They might be very, very successful in doing it, but that could be very, very uncomfortable” — to the point, he says, that they “lose control of that process.”

He’s touting gold, which has rallied this year, as an alternative to the dollar. So too is Jeffrey Gundlach, CEO of DoubleLine Capital. Gundlach is particularly concerned about the soaring US interest tab and how it’s amplifying the deficit. “The reckoning is coming,” he told a Bloomberg conference last week. A day earlier, Paul Tudor Jones, one of the pioneers of macro-hedge fund investing, predictedthe US fiscal woes would drag the dollar down another 10% over the next 12 months.

Investors Are Reconsidering Dollar's Value Under TrumpGreenback hit by blitz of tariff rollouts and pauses

Source: Bloomberg

Note: Date markers are approximate.

The Jones call is an extreme example of an increasingly popular view on Wall Street. The consensus analyst forecast is now for the dollar to steadily fall against the euro, yen, pound, Swiss franc, Canadian dollar and Australian dollar over the next several years. Among the most bearish: Morgan Stanley, which says the greenback will tumble to levels last seen during the Covid-19 pandemic by next year, and Goldman Sachs, which estimates it’s 15% overvalued.

In the futures market, the bets against the dollar began to pour in from the moment Trump took office in January.

By March, the wagers had grown so large that hedge funds and other investors had amassed their first net bearish position on the dollar in six months, according to CFTC data, and by mid-June, that position had swelled to $15.9 billion. On Tuesday, Bank of America released a survey showing global fund managers are more underweight the dollar now than at any point in the past 20 years.

Derivatives Traders Are Now Bearish on the DollarAggregate net short totals around $15.9 billion in most recent data

Source: Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Bloomberg

Note: Data includes net futures positions recorded by CFTC through June 10, 2025

Doubts about the dollar’s hegemony are nothing new, of course. Ever since it was anointed the world’s reserve currency in the aftermath of WWII, bouts of angst have emerged from time to time. There’s a resilience to the US economy, though, that has always brought the dollar back.

Besides, there are no obvious candidates to supplant it — all the other major currencies have problems of their own — and so dollar outflows typically peter out at some point. “The question is, what do you own?” said Daniel Murray, deputy CIO of EFG International in Zurich. “It’s tough because there are not really any other markets out there that are sufficiently deep and broad.”

And for all the concern that the dollar is losing its status as a safe-haven asset under Trump, it’s rallied the past few days, albeit tepidly, after Israel launched an attack on Iran that threatens to roil the Middle East and snarl oil markets.

The dollar has been mostly stable — as have Treasury bond yields — since the Trump tariff rollout sparked a three-week rout in April that lopped 4% off its value. And the dollar is still stronger today, when measured against most major currencies, than it was when Trump left office back in 2021. When asked whether the administration was concerned about the dollar’s recent declines, a Treasury spokesperson pointed to this historical context, noting it’s stronger today than it’s been on average over the past four decades.


Currency traders work near a screen showing the foreign exchange rate between U.S. dollar and South Korean won.
Photographer: Ahn Young-joon/AP

This could explain some of the nonchalance coming from the administration. For years, Trump and his inner circle advocated for a weaker dollar to help manufacturers compete against cheap imports and hire more factory workers at home.

And while he’s been quiet on that topic since returning to the White House, many believe it continues to shape his thinking on the dollar. They point to the administration’s decision not to quickly address speculation last month that it was pushing for a weaker dollar as part of the tariff negotiations with Taiwan and South Korea. That chatter had sent the dollar cratering against both currencies, fueling a broader selloff across Asia and deepening its losses this year. “The message is subtle but clear: Dollar strength is now negotiable,” said Haris Khurshid, chief investment officer at Karobaar Capital in Chicago.

Days after the selloffs, Stephen Miran, chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, did push back on the speculation when asked on Bloomberg’s Big Take DC podcast, saying there was no such US policy.


President Donald Trump holds a document from the Office of the United States Trade Representative during a tariff announcement.
Photographer: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA

Then there’s the “revenge” tax, as Section 899 of the Trump tax bill wending its way through Congress has become known. Surrounded by page after page of tax cut provisions for American workers and companies, it’d increase the income tax rate on investors based in foreign countries with policies the US deems discriminatory. Its inclusion further underscores how little concern there is within the administration about driving away global investors.

This is what worries Miller, the consultant with GSFM in Australia. When he talks about how Trump is “playing with fire,” it’s because a seemingly painless, gradual currency decline can quickly turn into a rout in a country as dependent on overseas financing as the US is. “You’re increasingly relying on the kindness of foreign investors now,” Miller said.

Trump’s tax bill, in its current state, would only add to those financing needs. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the version passed by the lower house would tack nearly $3 trillion onto US deficits over the next decade.

Even if the tax bill were rejected, the government’s finances look precarious. The budget deficit has swelled to more than 6% of gross domestic product the past couple years, the largest on record excluding times of war or steep economic downturn. And the government’s debt pile has soared to $29 trillion, equal to almost 100% of GDP. A decade ago, that number was 72%.

In May, the US lost its last AAA credit rating when Moody’s Ratings downgraded it, citing the ballooning deficits.

Weeks earlier, investors carried out a downgrade of sorts themselves. As Trump was rolling out his tariff plan, they started treating Treasury bonds — long considered the risk-free benchmark on Wall Street — like risky assets, selling (and buying) them in tandem with stocks.

The traditional correlation between Treasuries and the dollar broke down, too. As Treasury yields rose, the dollar fell. For years, the opposite had been true: rising rates lured investors to the world’s reserve currency, pushing it higher.

Now, though, with the US increasingly isolated internationally and sinking ever deeper in debt, a very different dynamic seemed to be taking hold: Investors were selling Treasuries, pushing up yields, and then yanking their money out of the country. The dollar-and-bonds correlation remains inverted today.

Leah Traub, a partner and portfolio manager on the global rates team at Lord Abbett, says there’s a self-reinforcing quality to the whole thing. As global investors start to diversify away from the dollar, they drive its value down, which only further underscores the benefits of such a strategy. And once that happens, Taub says, “it’s really hard to put the cat back in the bag.”

— With assistance from Ye Xie and Greg Ritchie



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/18/2025 12:30:08 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217541
 
re <<if...intentionally clueless>>

zerohedge.com

Strategic Silver — Fuelling Missiles and GPUs

BY THE MARKET EAR

WEDNESDAY, JUN 18, 2025 - 0:38

Spicy
Silver continues higher post the mini consolidation we saw over the past week. Massive breakouts like the one we saw recently tend to create big vacuums above and assets usually squeeze for longer than most think possible. Our call spreadlogic stays intact, and don't forget rolling into higher strikes as silver squeezes further.



Source: LSEG Workspace

Getting excited
Silver net non commercials are getting fired up lately, but positioning still lags the price of silver.



Source: LSEG Workspace

You need silver to run wars
You need silver for among other things hypersonic missiles. Chart shows silver, ITA and the European defence ETF, DFNS.



Source: LSEG Workspace

You need silver to run AI
Nothing new really, but silver and NVDA continue moving in close tandem... and the AI narrative is still very strong.



Source: LSEG Workspace

Switching?
Are investors switching from gold to platinum and silver? Chart shows futures open interest.



Source: UBS



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/18/2025 12:44:35 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Respond to of 217541
 
i give it another day or so. you don't watch and rec the interview...gotta go.

seriously step up.

i'm not interested in being your entertainment because ur bored and stupid and have nothing better to do than hang out here.

the few guys who are actually in the market, rec me.

or fuck off babes.

i'm fucking done otherwise.

or pay me.

fucking fucks.



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/18/2025 12:47:08 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217541
 
re <<if...intentionally clueless>>

is silver needed for war fighting ?



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/18/2025 12:50:45 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217541
 
re <<if...intentionally clueless>>

Need clarification re "For context: A single month of high-intensity combat could consume 5–7% of global annual silver production (˜2,500–3,500 tonnes)" ... for example the one between Russia and Ukraine or between Israel and Iran, or are you referencing preparations for WWIII ?




To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/18/2025 12:54:13 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217541
 
re <<if...intentionally clueless>>

How safe would it be to go all-in on silver if one takes a 12-months horizon and can withstand volatility? and what trading range like?



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/18/2025 12:01:59 PM
From: marcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217541
 
please send payment for our recs.
:0)

yes, you provide some excitment and perspective.
and i admit to some or much cluelessness, during these times of uncertainty.
-g-



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (215006)6/22/2025 3:44:16 AM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217541